Joy Alukkas Owner Name, Net Worth, Family, Controversies In 2023

Joy Alukkas: Rise to Success and ED's Asset Attachment Raises Questions
 

The Enforcement Directorate (ED) has recently attached assets worth Rs 305 crore belonging to Joy Alukkas, the chairman and managing director of the renowned conglomerate Joyalukkas Group. This move has sparked curiosity and raised questions about the reasons behind targeting such a prominent figure in the jewelry industry.

Joy Alukkas, also known as Alukkas Varghese Joy, has achieved remarkable success in his journey from a school dropout to running 150 jewelry showrooms across India and 10 other countries. He is considered the 69th richest individual in India and ranked 950th among billionaires worldwide, with a net worth of USD 3.1 billion as of February 26, 2023, according to Forbes magazine.

The legacy of the Alukkas jewelry group traces back to the formation of the state of Kerala. The business began as a small gold shop in Thrissur founded by AH Varghese, who had been running an umbrella manufacturing unit and a stationary store. Joy Alukkas, the fourth son of AH Varghese, joined the family business at the age of 14 and immersed himself in the gold industry. He did not complete his education and devoted himself entirely to the business. In 1976, AH Varghese handed over the gold business to his five sons, who collectively operated under the name Alukkas Jewellery.

Joy Alukkas made a significant breakthrough in 1986 when he ventured into the United Arab Emirates (UAE) to establish his business in the Middle East. Despite initial concerns due to the ongoing Iran-Iraq war, Joy convinced his father to support his endeavor. He opened his first outlet in Abu Dhabi in 1987, followed by another showroom in Dubai and a third in Sharjah. This expansion proved immensely successful, and it laid the foundation for Joy's future accomplishments.

The rebranding of the company played a pivotal role in Joy Alukkas' success. Changing the name from "ALUKKAS" to "Joyalukkas" in sentence case was a strategic move that resonated well with customers. Inspired by seeing a billboard for Majid Al Futtaim, a company that had undergone a similar split and rebranding, Joy decided to adopt a similar approach. This decision propelled Joy Alukkas ahead of his brothers and positioned him as a leading figure in the industry.

While Joy Alukkas enjoyed tremendous success with his international business ventures, he faced challenges with the financial law enforcement authorities in India. In 2018, the Kochi Income Tax department conducted a raid on 130 showrooms and premises associated with the Joyalukkas Group. The investigation revealed unaccounted-for sales of gold jewelry amounting to Rs 500 crore. The allegations included purchasing used gold jewelry from customers, inflating wastage, and evading taxes on a significant scale.

Now, the Enforcement Directorate has initiated its own action against the conglomerate. Assets worth more than Rs 305 crore belonging to Joy Alukkas have been attached. According to the ED's press release, the investigation uncovered a substantial amount of cash that was transferred to Dubai from India through illegal money transfer channels and subsequently invested in Joyalukkas Jewellery LLC, a company fully owned by Joy Alukkas Verghese.

The case against Joy Alukkas and the attachment of his assets shed light on the hawala operations conducted by gold retailers in Kerala. It is a well-known practice where gold retailers send ornaments from Kerala to their shops in the Middle East, portraying them as exports. In return, they import gold without paying the required customs duty, taking advantage of the import-against-export window. Such activities involving inflated export quantities are prevalent among gold and jewelry makers across the country.

The ED's actions have had repercussions for the Joyalukkas Group. The company has postponed its planned initial public offering (IPO) following the commencement of the raids. This is the second time the IPO has been postponed, as a previous filing in 2011 was rejected by the Securities and Exchange Board of India.

While the ED's actions have attracted attention, there seems to be a lack of in-depth media coverage on the issue. Apart from rehashing the details from the ED's press release, few outlets have delved deeper into the matter. However, considering the connections and influence that some industry rivals have with the ruling powers, insiders believe there may be more to the situation than meets the eye.